McKenzie Friend Non Molestation-Finding of Fact Hampshire Portsmouth

see our main page for more information 

McKenzie Friend Non-Molestation-Finding of Fact Hampshire-Portsmouth Southampton

McKenzie Friend Manchester Non-Molestation and Finding of Fact

πŸ”΄ Non-Molestation order, defending or in need of the protection of the family court.πŸ”΄

Mckenzie friend advice find a mckenzie friend Mckenzie friend Non Molestation order.

If you are in need of advice, to contest or accept part of the allegation, then you need to call us βœ… for a free Initial Consultation. Low- cost support.

πŸ”΄High-Conflict Complex Child Custody & None Molestation cases that need Expertise.

With over 30 years of successful experience in some of the most demanding cases
Highly Experienced Professional McKenzie Friend – Family Court Support

πŸ”΄Defending a Non-molestation order. In most cases, you should not accept a non-molestation order due to false allegations

πŸ”΄ especially when the court or the opposing legal team offers an undertaking, as this puts you in an unfair position.

πŸ”΄- I offer practical, affordable support for parents who can't afford expensive solicitor fees. If you're on a tight budget and need help, I'm here to support you.

I am regarded as one of the most knowledgeable and experienced McKenzie Friends in the UK, with over 30 years' experience. in more than 5,000 children's cases.

"I have maintained a strong record of success in highly complex cases, most notably securing a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 2012 known as the voice of the child " Judges' Comments as someone with life experience, and an Expert in his own right, his knowledge to present a legal argument is inspirational.

Non Molestation cases and help before attending a hearing

βœ… What you can do:

  • πŸ”΄ Go through the allegations with the person and help them understand each point.

  • πŸ”΄ Plan questions they want to ask the other party.

  • πŸ”΄ outline inconsistencies or gaps in statements/evidence.

  • πŸ”΄ their answers in a mock "cross-examination" style so they feel confident.

  • πŸ”΄ Organise their evidence to support their responses.

  • πŸ”΄ Court procedure and what the judge expects.

    matters of police disclosure and statements from witnesses

    Significant allegations of Rape will need dedicated time

    Allegations of child abuse and who this was reported to are significant also, the testing of evidence is vital to your success

πŸ”΄There is, therefore, a great deal of discretion afforded to the court in determining what constitutes molestation and, consequently, whether an application should succeed.

This should not be troublesome in a case involving clear acts or threats of violence. However, where the molestation complained of is more indirect in its effect on the applicant, success could prove more problematic. For example, if a respondent is handing out leaflets containing marital secrets, then there is a real question as to what extent this qualifies as molestation (C v C above). It would normally be argued as molestation in the form of harassment, but there is clearly potential for this to fail.

A good rule to bear in mind as part of the drafting is that the less actual violence or direct fettering with the applicant's person, there has been, the more detail will be needed to explain exactly why the order should be granted. The behaviour of the respondent should be clearly defined, causally linked to the applicant's reaction, which should, of course, be given as much detail as possible too.

πŸ”΄The importance of the affidavit in such a situation is that if one is making an application before the 'district judge of the day', as is likely, it will be almost impossible to enter into much by way of oral argument and persuasion. The hard work must be done before the hearing, with a suitably drafted affidavit that can address these potential concerns.

πŸ”΄Reasons for making the application ex parte

It is a requirement of rule 3.8 (5) of the FPR 1991 that a reason must be expressly stated for why the application is being made ex parte rather than inter partes. The language of the test set out at s.45 (2), FLA 1996 should be closely used when drafting this paragraph:.